Governments like control. All centralized media has been censored by Government in some form. James Joyce’s Ulysses was banned in both UK and US until the 1930’s. Book burning is an old practice. Most recently made popular by Hitler in 1933. Radio, TV, movies, and games are all censored through national ratings panels. Beyond that, 6 companies control almost the entire mainstream broadcast media. Pushing their own agendas and self-censorship is what any corporation trying to maximize it’s profits is going to puruse.
It’s in this climate, with this history, that democratic and communist countries are beginning to enforce internet censorship.
The Great Firewall of China blocks any content outside of the government’s vision/propaganda model.
The UK blocked wikipedia due to a cd cover.
Thailand has a list of over 50,000 sites blocked. This ranges from YouTube videos, and mirrors of the videos. To Hillary Clinton and Charile Chaplin.
Burma during the 2007 protests for democracy ‘turned off’ the internet to stop media from reporting about the public murdering of monks and protesters.
Germany recently passed a federal law in relation to filtering “child pornography” on the internet.
New Zealand has the Guilt Upon Accusation law ‘Section 92A’ that calls for internet disconnection based on accusations of copyright infringement without a trial and without any evidence held up to court scrutiny.
Iran, after the recent election fraud blocked access to Facebook and other social networks to try and stop coordination of protesters.
Australia is in the process of implementing a mandatory nation-wide filter, called a clean feed, that works on a black-list system. Meant to block only child pornography, but ‘over-blocks’ up to 7.8% of the time, as well as ‘under-blocking’ up to 13%.
Governments around the world regardless of their political background, see internet filtering as a viable option. I see very little point in fighting them on this point. They have censored every prior broadcast medium, and there’s 8 different countries above implementing some for of internet censorship. The battle to stop internet censorship is lost.
I think we need to advance to the next stage of the battle. I think we need to start working on attractive looking packages for those-who-cannot-help-themselves. We don’t agree with censorship, but it appears we aren’t able to stop it being implemented by proving it’s wrong. What we can do is prove it’s without merit and easily circumvented.
A nice looking package should be equal parts education and technology based. The OpenDNS model of add-value 3rd party free public service (DNS) could work wonderfully. In our case, it maybe DNS as well as proxy. Couple that with a tiered/paid access model giving faster speeds to those who want it, and there’s economic incentives.
The above ‘package’ works on filtered content. Thing is, it doesn’t help if links/ports/sites are shutdown. It may not be possible to proxy through reduced pipes. This is a much harder problem to fix, as infrastructure must be connected to local houses, but also needs to uplink to something/someone not filtering; meaning using links outside the country.
I think we need to change our focus, and start preparing for the next stage of this battle. Scalable solutions are easily deployed. Working with/around link filtering is much harder. My hobby problem at the moment is enabling internet in places without solid local internet uplinks. I don’t have answers, this is just the beginning. Thoughts?